Comparison
Технобокс. vs Тренды задавать
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @technbox | @trendi |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 1.4M | 1.2M |
| Avg views | 92,699 | — |
| Engagement rate | 6.6% | 0.0% |
| 30-day growth | +22.1% | +25.5% |
| Language | Русский | Русский |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 688 days | — |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@technbox
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@trendi
Not enough data
- Not enough history yet for a full assessment
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.